This blog is dedicated to making informed and proper critiques of the Canadian Government, and promoting a Conservative mindset.

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

A Tax That Makes Sense. Finally, Eh?

The BC Government has just released its budget for the 2008 fiscal year. A pretty calm budget, there was something smart worked in. The BC Government is the first in Canada to provide a concise carbon-tax, taxing people based on how much carbon-based fuel they burn.

Of course, they chose to provide an offset to the electorate in order to hopefully not cost anyone too much more money. Every person and child in the province will be written a cheque for $100 this spring and they have also announced a lowering of the lowest tax rate, money earned under $70,000/year, by five points, making it the lowest in Canada. As a further measure, they will lower the commercial rate by one percent immediately, to 11%, and then to 10% in 3 years. The total tax rate in 3 years for a business will be 25%, when Federal tax is mixed in, 10% lower than most US Jurisdictions.

The tax is currently $10 of tax per tonne of CO2 emissions, rising by $5 yearly until it reaches $30/tonne in 2012. This translates into an increase of 2.4 cents per litre for gasoline and 2.8 cents per litre for your home heating oil. If you're burning 50 litres per week (already a fair bit), it's the equivalent of a cup of coffee per week. This rate isn't too steep, so do your math before you lash back!

This plan isn't fool proof, you can be guaranteed many people will not be happy with the idea. But it frees up the income of those who are saving energy, providing potentially huge savings to the residents of downtown Vancouver, big users of public transit. It will encourage others to make a decision too, a decision as to whether they should continue burning ridiculous amounts of fuel, or switch to something more efficient and use the money saved to buy something cool, or pay off debt, or save for retirement. Do what you want. Just stop driving so much!

Of course, the Finance Minister, Carole Taylor, took this as an opportunity to jab at the rest of the country, pointing out that they led the introduction of aerobics, whole-wheat breads and overall healthier lifestyles. Perhaps Premier Ghiz of PEI took take a page out of this book for his second budget, due out within a month or two. Last year, he lowered the tax on gas and delayed the opening of a wind farm project. Two very environmentally sound decisions, right?

Friday, February 1, 2008

So why'd you pass this law again?

So the American government has delayed the "very important" Passport requirement. Again. Apparently, while Europe's opening their internal borders, we're America is closing ours. How do they justify this law? Well, they say that since 9/11, there needs to be more security. Here we are 7 years later and they've decided that Canadians are so unruly that we're causing the world to end or something. They still haven't implemented "critical" security measures and keep delaying them as the date approaches.

I sure miss the good old days when I could travel to America without even a piece of ID. I'd like to see evidence of Canadians going to America with the intent of committing crimes.

It's a joke that someone would turn up at the border, and be told "you're actually not supposed to be allowed in without a Passport. Here's a pamphlet to tell you that you need a Passport. You can go in now." Don't read it while driving. I'm sure it will put you to sleep (a greater danger than not bringing your Passport, no doubt). If this measure is so important, than why are we always getting extensions?

Listen to the public here. Europe's doing just fine. We want the old way back. Look at the reports, America is more likely to be attacked by people who already live there than by someone from outside, especially Canada. Sure, go ahead and put stiffer controls in place, but Passports? Quit dreaming.

What are you thinking, Mr. Dion?

Stéphane Dion is at it again. After not checking his facts (or sources) again, Mr. Dion blamed a Conservative spokesperson for an "extortion attempt" concerning a Montréal property developer. Since Mr. Dion seems to have no idea what extortion is, he issued an apology Thursday afternoon after question period, a quick, uncalculated response to a quick, uncalculated decision. Almost as soon as Dimitri Soudas' (the spokesperson) lawyers contacted Dion demanding an apology, he gave one. Seems he knew he screwed up.

The opposition parties are getting into quite a tussle since these allegations came out. Mr. Soudas claims to have contacted the Department of Public Works to get information about the lawsuit with the Montréal firm. Now, as a Canadian citizen, he has the right to ask these kind of questions. Is there evidence that he had ties with the firm, or that he tried to help the firm? No. But the Bloc is trying hard to get him in trouble for not helping the firm. Strange, isn't it?

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/01/31/soukas-letter.html
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2008/01/30/harper-soudas.html